What Most Virtual Finance Firms Don’t Do | Global Shared Services

October 23, 2018

There are a lot of virtual finance firms in the world today.

As we’ve discussed before, the abundance of virtual firms makes sense; the technology that makes remote collaboration possible, in tandem with the push for efficiency in service, has given rise to an abundance of outsourcing possibilities. Interestingly, though, the market isn’t evenly distributed. Instead, outsourced finance firms have clustered around two ends of the market: small businesses and big corporations.

Here’s what’s happened: on one side, there are firms that service a variety of small business clients. These are the regional bookkeeping shops that might take on a local car dealership, a coffee shop, and a dentist, and provide each with a high level of communication. They’re a friendly face, but these firms would be hard-pressed to take on an enterprise organization.

On the other side of the continuum are massive outsourcing firms that are staffed to provide the big corporations with efficient service. They’ve got plenty of power to scale accounting work – but because they’re built big, they can’t offer much in the way of personal communication unless they’re working with $500 million clients and up.

Practically, that means that there’s a big gap in the middle of the outsourced accounting service market.

Smaller firms offer personal communication. Big firms scale well. Very few firms, though, do both.

That can make outsourcing finance and accounting difficult for many enterprise businesses (those bigger than a local coffee shop but somewhere below Starbucks). The reality is that both communication and the resources to scale are essential to success.

Fortunately, there are solutions that bridge the gap. Here’s how.

What the Big Firms Don’t Offer: Meeting with the Team

Outsourcing makes remote work possible, but we’ve found that the best communication still happens face-to-face – especially as a relationship begins.

Many large-scale virtual finance firms lead with a salesperson who’s tasked with navigating all early-stage communication. This person might be a great communicator. Unfortunately, their communication skills won’t matter much when they detach themselves from the account after the first month.

That’s why we hold comprehensive kickoff meetings, where, if possible, we’ll bring our team leaders to the event in person, so that all involved can build the foundation of a good relationship. When the real people who will be on an account are able to discuss the intricacies of the work with the real people who they’ll be serving, the chances for success are much higher.

We don’t bait and switch. Instead, we make sure to bring the team into the picture early to establish relationships that will last.

What the Big Firms Don’t Do: Present Information in a Way That’s Valuable

For a virtual finance firm, maximal efficiency means providing work with minimal communication or management. That’s especially true for accounts that aren’t Fortune 500. That’s why so many virtual finance firms rely on low-effort methods of communication – something akin to a self-service approach.

Under this approach, there’s no proactive point of contact. Instead, firms complete work and display it in a client portal, and clients are responsible to access it themselves.

That works well when there are no questions around the work. If explanation is needed, though, the self-service model quickly turns into a bad service model.

We believe communication is necessary. That’s why we don’t rely on self-service. We do feature cutting-edge software and easily accessible work products, but we also ensure that clients have access to a reliable point of contact who can consult with them when questions arise. That way, clients get full value from the service.

What the Small Firms Don’t Offer: The Ability to Scale

Small outsourcing firms, on the other hand, tend to be great at communicating service. But they simply lack the resources to provide service to bigger accounts. For one thing, they’re typically made up of small, local teams, so they often lack the workforce that’s needed. For another thing, the diversity of businesses these smaller firms work with makes streamlining processes difficult.

We offer a powerful team that’s fully staffed to service larger accounts. And we’re geared toward technology and franchise businesses, which allows us to efficiently serve clients based on industry expertise.

What the Small Firms Don’t Offer: Large-Scale Expertise

And, speaking of expertise, that’s the final piece to the puzzle for many businesses looking to scale. Expertise in highly-leveraged financial situations – mergers, acquisitions, equity raising contexts, and more – can play a huge role in the success of growing businesses.

Small firms might be adept at bookkeeping, but they rarely have the depth of experience that’s necessary to help businesses successfully navigate more advanced financial situations. Big firms might have expertise, but they typically only offer it to their largest clients (and, interestingly, some larger firms are often so streamlined that they aren’t well-equipped to handle much outside of specific accounting needs).

We’re well-equipped for standard financial and accounting needs, but we’re also built on deep expertise. We have the ability to offer insight into data, not just process it. And we’ve walked with growing businesses through highly-leveraged financial situations to provide the insight that’s so essential to growing intelligently.

Looking for the Best of Both Worlds?

If you’re tired of settling for service that can’t scale or doesn’t offer the communication you need, don’t worry – you can have the best of both worlds.

At Global Shared Services, we do what most virtual finance firms don’t: help you to bridge the gap to reach the next level in the market.

We focus on restaurant accounting and franchise accounting. If you’re in one of those industries and you’re ready to scale your business with finance and accountings services you can trust, let’s talk.

Share this post

Insights

Related Posts

By Nick Stauff October 27, 2025
Discover how Global Shared Services helped a 50-location restaurant chain avoid default, slash audit costs, and drive a $2M EBITDA turnaround in just 9 months.
By Nick Stauff October 27, 2025
Discover why financial benchmarking in restaurants isn’t just about comparing numbers. Learn how top operators use it to build clarity, control cash, and drive EBITDA growth.
By Nick Stauff October 13, 2025
Most restaurant owners know what it’s like to manage every detail. You built your team, learned each regulation the hard way, and protected the culture you built. The thought of letting someone else handle your HR, payroll, or accounting sparks real anxiety. What if you lose sight of the details that set your restaurant apart? What if the personal touch gets overlooked? These worries can stall growth early. If you’ve wondered whether outsourcing means losing touch with your operation, you’re not alone. That fear comes up often in conversations with operators. In a recent discussion with Melissa Duque , Associate General Counsel and HR Manager at Accurate Employer Solutions (AES), the struggle became clear. Melissa’s candid perspective argues that trying to keep every task in-house can be the bigger risk. The Outsourcing Control Myth Restaurant operators often feel that keeping payroll, HR, and finance in-house means keeping control. You know your people, your brand, and your standards. Letting outsiders in can cause worry about culture, compliance, and potential mistakes. Many owners think they’re the only ones who can protect quality and keep their business safe. This belief lingers because the restaurant industry depends on slim margins and close relationships. Owners worry about losing touch or missing details. Still, doing everything yourself can lead to burnout, slower performance, and missed opportunities. This belief keeps many in routines that sap time and block growth. What Really Happens When You Outsource HR and Finance Restaurant owners face tough choices about where to spend their time. Outsourcing HR and finance brings in specialized experts who understand compliance, payroll, and benefits in detail. You spend less time on paperwork and more time leading your team. Operators see fewer errors, more reliable payroll, and current compliance, even across multiple locations. As Melissa puts it, “We have specialized folks in different areas of HR, whether that be payroll, benefits, administration, compliance.” The change provides clear reporting and data you can act on. Outsourcing gives you tools and freedom to focus on operations, growth, and the culture that makes your restaurant distinct.
By William Fleming October 13, 2025
Running a restaurant is tough. Rising labor costs, unpredictable sales, and slim margins make financial discipline essential. Yet many operators fall into a common trap: setting ambitious stretch goals instead of building realistic budgets their teams can actually follow. Restaurant budget accountability addresses this problem directly. The goal isn’t simply to slash costs. It’s about giving every manager and team member clear targets, ownership of results, and tools to make better financial decisions every day. Why Stretch Targets Fail Restaurants Stretch targets may sound inspiring, but realistic budgets are what keep operations on track. When restaurant leaders confuse the two, accountability breaks down. Imagine telling managers to hit a 25% labor cost in a market where wages push the realistic number closer to 30%. Everyone knows the goal is impossible. Morale sinks, bonuses go unpaid, and managers stop paying close attention to schedules and waste. Unrealistic goals create disengagement, while realistic, data-backed budgets give teams confidence. When incentives align with achievable targets, such as reducing prime cost by one point compared to last quarter, managers are motivated to act. To avoid this disconnect, operators can use tools like restaurant forecasting , which applies real sales data to set benchmarks that teams can actually reach. What Restaurant Budget Accountability Really Means Restaurant budget accountability means: Every budget target has a clear owner. Performance is tracked regularly against actual results. Variances are addressed right away, not weeks later. A kitchen manager might own food costs, while the GM owns labor scheduling. When each leader knows what they control, accountability becomes a shared effort instead of a directive from above. Building accountability also depends on accurate restaurant accounting practices . With clear reporting, managers can see where labor cost percentage or food cost percentage drifts from the plan and take corrective action quickly. Why Budgets Break Down Even well-meaning plans fall apart without accountability. The most common pitfalls usually fall into three areas. Unrealistic forecasting. Building in stretch assumptions like 20% sales growth or sudden cost cuts makes buy-in impossible. Misaligned incentives. When bonus plans are tied to unattainable labor or food cost percentages, trust erodes quickly. High turnover and inconsistent processes. Without standard training and review cycles, costs swing and accountability disappears. Many of these issues mirror the top restaurant accounting mistakes , like relying on poor data or failing to update budgets when conditions change. When accountability fades, goals are missed, resources are wasted, and cash flow problems pile up. 

Position your business for success

See how we can help.

Schedule a call